Global Warming or the Next Ice Age? Essay

It would be safe to assume that mood change is going to be around for a long time and have an gigantic pretend on the lives of many people. Humans have had a huge encounter on the environment for many years and stooge be relate to one the main factors of global warming. globose warming is a composition that has received much attention in recent years merely our temper change is non a recent business. If the U.S. Continues to ignore mood change then the effect on the environment testament impress humans. Despite what many major power think, climate change is well k at one time across hundreds of nations totally everywhere the world. My thesis is the Greenland icing cap is twain shrinking and expanding, and climate change can be linked to two trends.The effect humans have had on the environment can be linked to the shrinking and expanding of the Greenland ice cap. In the book The Science and political sympathies of Global Climate Change it is discussed how greenhous e gasses have been increasing in the atmosphere for the last two centuries or so, primarily as a result of human activity. (Dessler and Parson 88). In addition, climate change willing most likely affect populations through impacts on the necessities and comforts of action such as water, energy, housing, transportation, food, natural ecosystems, and health systems. Rural communities tend to be more(prenominal) dependent on climate-sensitive livelihood activities and have fewer resources and fond support systems compared to urban populations (Alig 73). The growth of our population has increased our use of fuel, land, and manufacturing. all told of these are increasing emissions into our atmosphere that increases global warming.The concern about climate change has been an issue for decades. Theres no specific appointee as such. The climate-change cut into, like all policy debates, is fundamentally an argument over action. An action needs to be stupefyn soon on how to act to c limate change. Listen to the debate and you will hear many distinct kinds of arguments about whether and how the climate is changing, whether human activities are responsible, how much of the change occurring might be natural, how the climate might change in the future, what the effects of the changes will be and whether they matter, and the feasibility, advantages, and disadvantages of various responses. Although these arguments are distinct, when advanced in policy debate they all serve to make a case for what we should or should not do (Dessler and Parson 31).Scientists had long been aware of the consequences of global warming and had been urgency governments to take action for many years. As far back as the 1950s there was pressure being pull on governments to take action notwithstanding very little was done. The one event that put the issue of global warming firmly on the political order of business was the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, this was attended by presidents, prime-min isters and heads of state from around the world. It wasnt the startle Earth Summit but it was the one where global warming was turn to and led to the unite Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. by-line inception the UNFCCC has met regularly in what is known as the Conference of Parties (COP) and it was at the 3rd COP that the Kyoto Protocol was adopted.If the U.S continues to ignore climate change the Greenland ice cap will continue to shrink and expand . In the enterprisingness decades of the 20th century, real estate hucksters, railroad tycoons and even government agencies persuaded thousands of dirt-poor farmers to arrange to the dry and windy center of the Great Plains, plow up millions of dry land of ancient grasslands and plant wheat. There were several reasons this was a bad idea, but for a couple of unusually wet decades, bumper crops were the norm. Then, in the 1930s, inevitable drouth returned. The land dried up and, quite literally, blew away in enormous black clouds that killed crops, livestock, children, old people and dreams which is also known as the junk Bowl. It was the worst man-made environmental disaster in American history.Now, as we grow more aware that we face the worst man-made environmental disaster in the history of the world, we are proving to be no more wise than the imprudent farmers who tore up the buffalo grass (Landon-Lane 11). The United States is a case in point. Some of the best climate scientists in the world are Americans. So are some of the most smooth-spoken and influential advocates for a global compact. Moreover, global compacts are an American specialty. At pivotal moments in the twentieth century, U.S. presidents were the chief architects, master-builders, and principal funders of international institutions notably, the UN itself that take shape a rule-based world order and have promoted the prosperity and security now threatened by climate change. Yet in the face of that threat, all four of Americ as most recent presidentsincluding, up until now, its flowing one have, for one reason or another, been unable to rise richly to the challenge (Antholis and Talbott 24)Global warming is a very difficult problem to fix. People are having a hard time agreeing on what to do about it. For example, everyone agrees that wasting energy is a bad thing to do. only some people think that the federal government should make laws about it, while other people think it should be up to distributively person or business to decide what to do. In conclusion, the process may not stop entirely, but we can try to keep the climate from reaching a point that we cant stop it. If everyone in the world stop polluting and begin keeping their environment clean it would help. Global warming may not be stopped but it can be reduced.