'How does Shakespeare present tension Essay\r'

' \r\n \r\nThe severalize in manner of speaking also applies to the language of the spirits of the Island which ar sh let to be quite delicate and poetic â€Å"wild waves whist”, Shakespeare uses alliteration of the letter ‘w’ to slows the pace of the bring and produces sounds that fetchs Ariel seem less human or earth-bound simply instead of the air or the waves. In contrast to the way Prospero treats Caliban, Prospero treats Ariel with affection, â€Å"my dainty Ariel”. Shakespeare uses the emphasis on the phrase â€Å"my” to suggest that Prospero is fonder of the possession of Ariel than Ariel him egotism.\r\nIf the Island back tooth be interpreted as a metaphor for humanity versus reputation then the differences in the way Caliban and Ariel are treat by Prospero defines humanity’s ambitions and fears. Prospero treats Ariel with love because he is an asset to him, â€Å"fine apparition, my quant Ariel”, and because of the index number that Prospero shoots through that mark off that makes him appear almost God-like. Humans fit the elements to gain a level of direction in their lives, to make sense of the meaninglessness of life.\r\nIt is this direction that leads Prospero to believe and direct to be like God because it strangles the community between him and the repulsive beings of disposition he has power over, such as Caliban. Equality leads to lack of control and it is Caliban’s adamant rebellion to be seen low that sickens Prospero. In the Tempest, Caliban represents people’s natural read and when Prospero oppresses Caliban, Shakespeare is creating an image of refinement repressing their natural selves and concluding that the tensions between civilisation and record only live on because of the way civilisation resents it’s natural state.\r\nWhen Gonzalo speaks of his sumptuous age he is explaining a world where nature and civilisation could exist as one without the tensions that are so apparent in the rest of the play. Gonzalo would submit â€Å"use of service, none”, â€Å"no occupation” just now rather live innocently with nature bringing â€Å"forth of its own kind, all foison… ” Shakespeare uses the structure of the speech, break off continuously by Antonio and Sebastian, to perhaps mock the base and highlight its faults.\r\nThe idea itself comes from a French philosopher who describes how the Europeans corrupt America with its advanced influence. Through Sebastian and Antonio, Shakespeare is undermining his words and this implies that his own opinion could be that nature and civilisation can never both exist without the differences or ill will between the two. I believe Shakespeare presents the tensions between refining and Nature not as to highlight their difference, only rather to highlight the tension that is created by high society’s denial in their similarities.\r\nPerhaps the repulsion of Caliban is seen as a rejection of each of the more polish characters untamed selves, their more ‘sophisticated’ selves portrayed as wit, cunning or power. By this, I could ordain that Shakespeare is presenting Caliban as the only true character in the whole play, though coarse and unrefined he is evidently not a master of government or scheming, such as the characters of Antonio and Sebastian, which has been learnt through the highest classes of fine-tune society.\r\nIn this, Shakespeare is saying that both nature and civilisation are equal, the only difference being that nature is not in a state of self denial. ?? ?? ?? ?? Show catch only The above preview is unformatted text This student written piece of performance is one of many that can be fix in our GCSE The Tempest section.\r\n'