12 Angry Men is a laugher round a jury of twelve people. The jury has to decide whether a teenage son is unlawful or destitute of cleanup spot his bring forth. In order to find him guilty they essential pay back no reasonable doubt. The play starts out as the jury takes a vote, eleven guilty and angiotensin converting enzymeness innocent. It is without delay up to the eleventh juror who voted innocent to persuade the another(prenominal) eleven jurors to change their minds. The jurors dispute about the evidence, curiously one exhi indorsement in particular, the dig used to twinge the sons father. A clerk from a corner store had state that the boy had bought the selfsame(prenominal) wound from him foregoing that day. They argue that this knife is in truth unique and that no one in the jury has seen one before and that it has to be the same knife the boy bought earlier that day. The jurors continue on disputing, that is until one of them pulls out the same postulate knife and stabs it into the table. The jury argues a bit about how pitch a knife like that into the court room is outlaw(prenominal) but and so realize the bigger picture, that at that place could be many people out there with the same knife.

This forthwith gives some reasonable doubt and shows that it could have been person else who stabbed the father to death. other important piece of evidence was an rare womans testimony. She had testified to that she saw the boy killing the man late at night plot of ground she was trying to sleep. One of the jurors then notices that while testifying, the old woman was rubbing her nose a lot- a common occasion ! for someone who wears glasses to do. Another juror then adds on to this and says he... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment